вторник, 19 мая 2015 г.

MH17: briefly


 

It is claimed "MH17 was hit by a big Buk missile not by a small AA missile":

It is claimed "the damage is consistent with Buk":
The blast point is observed by Almaz-Antey (the Buk producer) in front the cockpit 1-2m. SAMs are designed to inflict maximum damage that is why they blow with a functional delay to hit areas less protected that is BEHIND the cockpit not IN FRONT.

And if it hit in front for unlikely chance then the blast from 1-2m would produce much more damage than it is observed:



It is claimed "no marks of cannon fire on MH17":





It is claimed "no holes above 20mm on MH17's debris":




It is claimed "Su-25's AA missile R-60 produces damage by continuous rods and it is not like shrapnel":


It is claimed "the Buk's missile contrail was spotted by a photographer":